With the dissemination of their content commercial media are among other things also able to transport values and ideologies. Usually their programming reflects society's dominant social, political, ethical, cultural and economical values. A critical view of the prevalent ideologies often is sacrificed so as not to offend the existing political elites and corporate powers, but rather satisfy shareholders and advertisers.
With most of the worlds content produced by a few commercial media conglomerates, with the overwhelming majority of companies (in terms of revenue generation) concentrated in Europe, the U.S., Japan and Australia there is also a strong flow of content from the 'North-West' to the 'South-East'. Popular culture developed in the world's dominant commercial centers and Western values and ideologies are so disseminated into the most distant corners of the earth with far less coming back.
TEXTBLOCK 1/3 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611795/100438659066
Commercial media aim towards economies of scale and scope and the satisfaction of their shareholders. As most of the private media companies' revenues come from advertising, much of their content is designed to allure audiences, whose size and composition is decisive for advertisers and marketers. Those revenues being of vital importance for commercial media firms, their programming in many cases is tailored to the needs of the advertising industry. In their self-interest commercial media also often accept pressure from marketers and advertisers. "... for example,
Hence, so as not to interfere with the commercial message, most media conglomerates concentrate on easy-to-consume programming with entertainment, music and sports forming most of their content. Although they also offer news and documentaries, programs focusing on topics of public interest or minority issues hardly play more than a supporting role as they do not comply with the demands of a profit oriented system. One of the most serious effects of this development is that citizens are substantially deprived of an essential element for their participation in the public sphere: objective, exhaustive and diverse information on issues of public concern.
TEXTBLOCK 2/3 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611795/100438659178
The more so-called security measures are taken the more control and the less freedom is granted. Whereas criminals are flexible in their computer work/digital existence, the average person cannot be. So it is her/him who gets punished with an increase of control.
Of course security can be in favor of the population as well - and this is the case if cryptography is legal so that everyone has access to it to protect his/her data. This one needs for e-commerce, secure payments and transmission of private data, mostly e-mails or access to websites where one needs a password. E-mails are nothing else than postcards, letters without envelopes. Without encryption they are easy to open, read and trace back, even without knowing the password. Rumors that Echelon works with a list of key-words, controlling any e-mail in the world and reacting to words of that list, led to actions like the Jam Eschelon Day, last time held on October 21st, 1999, to confuse the espionage system.
for more information on Jam Eschelon Day see:
But the respect for privacy stands for an essential values in democratic societies.
So, how can it be regarded a governmental risk?
At a conference:
"How many people here fear a greater risk
from government abuses of power
than from criminal activity?"
The majority raised their hands,
one participant shouted "What's the difference?"
(anonymous)
If governments really care for the people and want to fight against cybercriminality they should rather support the work on the latest technologies for encryption than to restrict their access. Or even better: they should not intervene at all - to make sure they do not build in any trapdoors. Though it is already too late for discussion like this one as the trapdoors are already part of most of the key-systems. Rumors about PGP and trapdoors do not help the confidence in cryptology.
for information about the risks of cryptography see:
TEXTBLOCK 3/3 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611776/100438659190