ECHELON Other involved countries

Other countries, that are said to be involved in ECHELON:

ITALY

UKUSA Third Party

NATO

TURKEY

UKUSA Third Party

NATO

GERMANY

UKUSA Third Party

NATO

JAPAN

UKUSA Third Party

1972 Project COMET, 1982 Weinberger show misuse of japanese technology transfer to russia

GREECE

UKUSA Third Party

NATO

NORWAY

UKUSA Third Party

1950 Genetrix Balloons, 1963 Project South Sea

SIGINT stations are operated by personnel of Norwegian Military Intelligence but were erected by the NSA and operated for them. CIA and NSA personnel were regularly on assignment at those stations.

DENMARK

UKUSA Third Party

NATO

SOUTH KOREA

UKUSA Third Party

?

THAILAND

UKUSA Third Party

?

PAKISTAN





CIA covert assistance to Afghan rebels trough Pakistan, mujaahdeen camps : trainers from CIA, ELINT from Soviet Union and South East Asia,

FINLAND





NSA purchases RADINT from Soviet Union by VKL

ISRAEL

Mossad, AMAN,

CIA, FBI, DIA, NSA, Foreign Technology Division,Foreign

Science and Technology Center

1951 James Jesus Angleton CIA

MEXICO





Soviet embassy interception

PHILLIPINES





?

CHINA





1970 Kissinger,1978 Abramowitz, basic agreement in 1980, CIA informs China about possible threats from Russia and moslem countries, 2 station were built; another joint project: 9 seismic monitoring stations; ILD and CIA conduct operations against soviet-backed forces in Angola, Cambodia, Afghanistan

AUSTRIA

UKUSA Third Party

?, ILETS, Enfopol

Russia





1990 Iraqi Invasion

SOUTH AFRICA





1960

Source: Jeffrey T. Richelson, The U.S. Intelligence Community, (Westview Press, 4th ed., 1999) p278-302

TEXTBLOCK 1/1 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611746/100438658930
 
Expert system

Expert systems are advanced computer programs that mimic the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of an expert in a particular discipline. Their creators strive to clone the expertise of one or several human specialists to develop a tool that can be used by the layman to solve difficult or ambiguous problems. Expert systems differ from conventional computer programs as they combine facts with rules that state relations between the facts to achieve a crude form of reasoning analogous to artificial intelligence. The three main elements of expert systems are: (1) an interface which allows interaction between the system and the user, (2) a database (also called the knowledge base) which consists of axioms and rules, and (3) the inference engine, a computer program that executes the inference-making process. The disadvantage of rule-based expert systems is that they cannot handle unanticipated events, as every condition that may be encountered must be described by a rule. They also remain limited to narrow problem domains such as troubleshooting malfunctioning equipment or medical image interpretation, but still have the advantage of being much lower in costs compared with paying an expert or a team of specialists.

INDEXCARD, 1/1