Selection of Independent Content Provider

The following selection does not claim to present an exhaustive listing, but rather picks some of the most interesting provider of independent content.

Independent Content Provider

URL

Classification of Content

Association for Progressive Communication (APC)

http://www.apc.org

Social issues, environment, economy, Africa, women

ZaMir.net

http://www.zamir.net

Anti-war, human rights (Yugoslavia)

Institute for Global Communications (IGC)

http://www.igc.org

Peace, economy, human rights, democracy, environment, women, anti-racism

FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting)

http://www.fair.org

Media

ZNet

http://www.zmag.org

Selection: culture, community/race/religion/ethnicity, ecology, economics/class, gender/kinship/sexuality, government/polity, international relations

B2-92

http://www.freeb92.net

Politics

FREEnet (The Network for Research, Education and Engineering)

http://www.free.net

Research/academic/education

c2o (Community Communications Online)

http://www.c20.org

Environment, social issues, human rights

Antenna

http://antenna.apc.org

Development co-operation/emergency aid, environment, ecology, energy, media, art, culture

PERDCA (The Project for Economic Reform and Development in Central Asia)

http://www.silk.org

Telecommunications, education, medicine

Comlink

http://www.comlink.org

Peace, ecology, social issues, human rights

Adbusters

http://www.adbusters.org

Culture, art

RTMark

http://www.rtmark.com

Culture, art

Interdoc

http://www.oneworld.org/interdoc/

Labor, human rights, development, environment, peace

GreenNet

http://www.gn.apc.org

Environment, peace, human rights, development

UN (United Nations)

http://www.un.org

Peace, economy, social issues, development, justice, human rights, international law, humanitarian assistance and various specialized agencies

Flipside

http://www.flipside.org

Economic, political, social, environmental

Human Rights Watch

http://www.hrw.org

Human rights

nettime

http://www.nettime.org

Culture

FoeBud e.V. (Verein zur Förderung des öffentlichen bewegten und unbewegten Datenverkehrs e.V.)

http://www.foebud.org

Research, politics, culture, arts, future/technology

Corporate Watch

http://www.corpwatch.org

Social issues, politics, economy, environment

Overcoming Consumerism

http://www.hooked.net/users/verdant/index.htm

Social issues, economy, environment

NewsWatch

http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/jsexton/NewsWatch/

Media

IFEX (International Freedom of Expression Exchange)

http://www.ifex.org

Media, human rights

FAS (Federation of American Scientists)

http://www.fas.org

Science, technology, public policy

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)

http://www.unesco.org

Education, science, culture, communication

Umwelt

http://www.umwelt.org

Environment



TEXTBLOCK 1/3 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611734/100438659267
 
RTMark

RTMark is a group of culture jammers applying a brokerage-system that benefits from "limited liability" like any other corporation. Using this principle, RTMark supports the sabotage (informative alternation) of corporate products, from dolls and children's learning tools to electronic action games, by channeling funds from investors to workers. RTMark searches for solutions that go beyond public relations and defines its "bottom line" in improving culture. It seeks cultural and not financial profit.

Strategies and Policies

RTMark is engaged in a whole lot of projects, which are designed to lead to a positive social change. Projects with roughly similar intent, risk, or likelihood of accomplishment are grouped into "fund families", like for example "The Frontier Fund". This fund is dedicated to challenge naive, utopic visions of the "global village", focusing on the implications of allowing corporations and other multinational interests to operate free of social context.

RTMark pursues its projects through donations by individuals, which can invest in a certain fund, whereby an exact specification of how the donated money should be used can be made. RTMark has repeatedly gained attention through its projects, especially with its spoof websites, like the ones of Rudy Giuliani and the WTO, or its campaign against eToys, which prevents the Internet art group etoy from using the domain etoy.com.

TEXTBLOCK 2/3 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611734/100438659283
 
Content Choice and Selective Reporting

Media as today's main information sources unarguably have the power to influence political agenda-setting and public opinion. They decide which topics and issues are covered and how they are reported. Still, in many cases those decisions are not primarily determined by journalistic criteria, but affected by external factors. The importance of shareholders forces media to generate more profit every quarter, which can chiefly be raised by enlarging audiences and hence attracting more advertising money. Therefore the focus of media's programming in many cases shifts towards audience alluring content like entertainment, talk-shows, music and sports.

Further pressure regarding the selection of content occurs from advertisers and marketers, who often implicitly or explicitly suggest to refrain from programming which could show them or their products and services (e.g. tobacco) in an unfavorable light. Interlocking directorships and outright ownerships can moreover be responsible for a selective coverage. Financial connections with defense, banking, insurance, gas, oil, and nuclear power, repeatedly lead (commercial) media to the withholding of information, which could offend their corporate partners. In totalitarian regimes also pressure from political elites may be a reason for the suppression or alteration of certain facts.

TEXTBLOCK 3/3 // URL: http://world-information.org/wio/infostructure/100437611734/100438658492